Summary :
"A Change of Worlds" is a speech given by Chief Seattle in 1854 to the governor of Washington Territory, Isaac Stevens. In the speech, Chief Seattle acknowledges the inevitability of the change that is coming to his people and their land as the white settlers continue to encroach. He expresses his sadness at the loss of his way of life, but he also expresses his hope for a future of peace and understanding between the two cultures.
Chief Seattle begins his speech by describing the beauty of the land that his people have lived on for generations. He speaks of the mountains, the rivers, the forests, and the animals that call this land home. He says that his people are "part of the earth and it is part of us." He then goes on to describe the changes that are coming to this land as the white settlers arrive. He says that the white people are "like the grass that covers vast prairies." They are many, and they are taking over the land.
Chief Seattle expresses his sadness at the loss of his way of life. He says that his people will no longer be able to live off the land as they have in the past. They will have to learn to live in the white man's world. However, he also expresses his hope for a future of peace and understanding between the two cultures. He says that the two peoples can learn from each other, and that they can live together in harmony.
Chief Seattle's speech is a powerful plea for understanding and respect. He acknowledges the inevitability of change, but he also expresses his hope for a future where the two cultures can live together in peace. His speech is a reminder of the importance of respecting the land and the cultures of others.
Here are some of the key themes of Chief Seattle's speech:
* The importance of respecting the land and the environment
* The need for understanding and respect between different cultures
* The inevitability of change, but the hope for a future of peace and harmony
Chief Seattle's speech is a powerful and moving testament to the importance of these themes. It is a speech that continues to be relevant today, as we face the challenges of globalization and cultural change.
Meaning and Purpose
1. **Do you agree with Chief Seattle's statement in paragraph 2 that whites and Native Americans are two distinct races with separate destinies?**
I do agree with Chief Seattle's statement that whites and Native Americans are two distinct races with separate destinies. The two cultures have very different ways of life, and they have different values and beliefs. For example, Native Americans have a deep connection to the land, while white settlers often see the land as something to be conquered and exploited.
2. **Chief Seattle expresses little hope for the future of Native Americans. Why?**
Chief Seattle expresses little hope for the future of Native Americans because he sees that the white settlers are taking over their land and destroying their way of life. He knows that his people will not be able to live as they have in the past, and he fears for their future.
3. **How does death affect the Whites and the Reds?**
Death affects the Whites and the Reds in different ways. The Whites see death as the end of life, while the Reds see it as a transition to another world. The Reds believe that their ancestors are still with them, and they often communicate with them through dreams and visions.
4. **In paragraph six Chief Seattle says, "The White Man will never be alone. What do you think he means?**
I think Chief Seattle means that the white settlers will never be able to escape the effects of their actions on the land and on the Native Americans. The land will always be there to remind them of what they have done, and the Native Americans will always be there to challenge them.
5. **Do the Native Americans believe in life beyond death? How do they look upon death?**
The Native Americans do believe in life beyond death. They believe that their ancestors are still with them, and they often communicate with them through dreams and visions. They see death as a transition to another world, and they do not fear it.
**Writing Strategy**
1. **Write an essay in which you compare your attitudes about other cultures, about nature, and about religion with those expressed by Chief Seattle.**
In my essay, I would compare my attitudes about other cultures, about nature, and about religion with those expressed by Chief Seattle. I would discuss how my attitudes have been shaped by my own culture and experiences, and how they compare to Chief Seattle's attitudes, which were shaped by his own culture and experiences. I would also discuss how my attitudes have changed over time, and how they might continue to change in the future.
2. **Find out some examples of similes in the text. How effective are they?**
There are several examples of similes in the text. For example, Chief Seattle compares the land to a mother, and he compares the white settlers to a swarm of locusts. These similes are effective because they help the reader to visualize the speaker's meaning. They also help to create a sense of beauty and power in the text.
3. **What is the tone of the speaker?**
The tone of the speaker is one of sadness, resignation, and hope. The speaker is sad because he sees that the white settlers are destroying his people's way of life. He is resigned because he knows that there is nothing he can do to stop them. However, he is also hopeful that the two cultures can learn to live together in peace.
**Discussion**
1. **If Chief Seattle were alive today, do you think he would be more or less optimistic than he was in 1854 about the future of the United States? Of Native Americans?**
I think Chief Seattle would be more optimistic about the future of the United States today than he was in 1854. He would see that the two cultures have learned to live together in peace, and he would see that the Native Americans have made significant progress in preserving their culture. However, he would also be aware of the challenges that still face the United States, and he would continue to work for a more just and equitable society.
2. **Identify Chief Seattle's attitudes toward the land, religion, and racial pride. Decide in what respects Nepali people's values are similar to and different from those of Chief Seattle.**
Chief Seattle had a deep connection to the land. He saw the land as a sacred place, and he believed that the Native Americans had a responsibility to care for it. He also had a strong belief in religion, and he believed that the land was a gift from the Creator. Chief Seattle was also proud of his race, and he believed that the Native Americans had a unique culture that should be preserved.
The Nepali people also have a deep connection to the land. They believe that the land is a sacred place, and they have a long history of living in harmony with nature. They believe that the land is a gift from God, and they have a strong sense of responsibility to care for it.
In terms of religion, the Nepali people are mostly Hindu, but there is also a significant Buddhist population. They believe that religion plays an important role in their lives, and they use it to connect with the land and with their ancestors.
Like Chief Seattle, the Nepali people are proud of their race and their culture. They believe that their culture is rich and valuable, and they are committed to preserving it.
Here are some of the similarities between Chief Seattle's values and Nepali people's values:
Both groups have a deep connection to the land.
Both groups believe that religion plays an important role in their lives.
Both groups are proud of their race and their culture.
Here are some of the differences between Chief Seattle's values and Nepali people's values:
Chief Seattle was more pessimistic about the future of his people, while Nepali people are more optimistic.
Chief Seattle was more focused on the past, while Nepali people are more focused on the future.
Chief Seattle was more concerned with preserving the land in its natural state, while Nepali people are more open to development.
Overall, there are many similarities between Chief Seattle's values and Nepali people's values. However, there are also some differences, which can be attributed to the different historical and cultural contexts of the two groups.
OR...
Chief Seattle's attitudes toward the land, religion, and racial pride, and how they compare to Nepali people's values:
**Land**
* Chief Seattle saw the land as a sacred place, and he believed that the Native Americans had a responsibility to care for it.
* Nepali people also have a deep connection to the land, and they believe that it is a sacred place.
* Both Chief Seattle and Nepali people believe that the land should be used sustainably, and that it should be passed on to future generations.
**Religion**
* Chief Seattle believed that the land was a gift from the Creator, and he had a strong belief in religion.
* Nepali people are also religious, and they believe that the land is a gift from God.
* Both Chief Seattle and Nepali people believe that religion plays an important role in their lives, and that it helps them to connect with the land and with their ancestors.
**Racial pride**
* Chief Seattle was proud of his race, and he believed that the Native Americans had a unique culture that should be preserved.
* Nepali people are also proud of their race, and they believe that their culture is rich and valuable.
* Both Chief Seattle and Nepali people believe that it is important to preserve their cultures, and that they should pass them on to future generations.
In addition to these similarities, there are also some differences between Chief Seattle's values and Nepali people's values. For example, Chief Seattle was more pessimistic about the future of his people, while Nepali people are more optimistic. Additionally, Chief Seattle was more focused on the past, while Nepali people are more focused on the future.
Overall, there are many similarities between Chief Seattle's values and Nepali people's values. Both groups have a deep connection to the land, they believe that religion plays an important role in their lives, and they are proud of their race and their culture. However, there are also some differences between the two groups, such as their views on the future and their focus on the past and the present.
***